• bier@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    4 days ago

    EU: We are not going to read your chats or look at your photos, we just stop the CP.

    People: so how will you know what chats and photos contain CP?

    EU: Just trust me bro…

  • onlooker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    5 days ago

    Only material that is clearly child sexual abuse will be searched for and can be detected.

    Uh-huh. And how do you search for something specific without decrypting everything first? This is fucking embarrassing.

    • Scavenger8294@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 days ago

      Wasn’t the plan for the messenger to scan for explicit material before the messages were sent (and encrypted)?

      • onlooker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m going off of a article by TechRadar, but essentially: yes. This isn’t about breaking encryption as I initially thought, though that seems to have been the goal when the same law was proposed (and rightfully rejected) in 2022. Rather, the new revision is about making encryption utterly pointless through the virtue of scanning all messages on your device, as you suggested. At least that’s my read on the situation.

        • Eirikr70@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          And so, where is the problem?.. Your message is scanned. If it is illegitimate you can’t send it. What is the problem?

          • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            5 days ago

            How will that initial scan take place? On your device, or sent to a server? Once you give the authorities that ability, will they stop at CSAM, or will they flag anti-israel content as well?

          • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            5 days ago

            The government doesnt get to read every message I send and see if they deem it sendable or not. Thats the problem

            If you think this would stop at CSAM then you’re naive.

          • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 days ago

            These same people are at the same time taking away freedom of speech to support a genocide. How do I know they won’t scan for pro Palestine content?

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s a fair clarification but hardly meaningful, and arguably much worse.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    “Only the thing we are searching for will be searched for”

    How do you know if a message has that content without scanning all messages to begin with?

    The fuck? Do they think we are stupid?

    • tiwdll@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      5 days ago

      Do they think we are stupid?

      They definitely do. And they are partly right, for the average person this is enough to stop worrying

  • krunklom@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m actually starting to think 25/7 monitoring of all digital communications is actually a good idea.

    For politicians.

    It’s the only way to sure they’re accountable to the public. This should be the trade off. You enter into politics and literally the only privacy you ever have is when you’re in the bathroom.

    Every fart, sneeze, cough, every email you send, every text you send on a phone, website you visit, is public record.

  • Catalyst@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 days ago

    They always use sex crimes and “the worst of the worst” as an excuse. Always. Then they come after political dissidents and the vulnerable.

  • klay1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    The wording of that message wiggles around a lot. When you read it again, you realize there can be:

    • almost every monitoring of online communications (just not ‘general’)
    • all chat scanning (just no chat ‘control’)
    • everything can be detected (just child abuse will be searched for AND detected)
    • sneak peaking at everybody’s chats is ok. (But ‘detection orders’ need a thorough process)

    This is the language of some one who knows is guilty

  • chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    6 days ago

    They should just mandate that the child pornographers set the evil bit. It would save the EU leaders the trouble of learning how cryptography works.

  • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yeah we all know that’s BS. “Child porn only” will become “anything illegal” which will become “whatever we want” and SL"with a warrant" will become “all the time”

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    they are gonna keep at it until it passes. the only way to stop this is deposing them.

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        no, they don’t. though if it were that easy we wouldn’t need to worry that much about things like chat control.

    • wolfiedafloof@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t see how we can stop it. If they don’t succeed this year, they will try the next, and if not next, they will try the year after until it works. How do we stop this? We can’t. Its like cancer. You can only slow the process down by being against them. Thats it :/ we all will be surveiled and there is nothing to stop it.

      All we do as privacy advocates is to jump around. If one thing becomes illegal, we jump over to something else that provides privacy once again.

      We are slowly becoming cashless, but new tech arrived and we started with crypto like monero. Once crypto is banned, we find different methods in staying anonymous or private :)

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        we depose them. they can’t try again next year if they are not in power. of course that’s easier said, but there is an out that’s historically effective against abuse of power.

        solutions like alternative apps and oses and techniques are always an individualistic bandaid that should be thought of as temporary until they close the loophole.

  • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    And this fight will have to be won every single time, while they have to win just once and we’ll never get it back ?
    It’s obviously a rigged game and such a game can only be won by cheating. Cheating so hard no one ever dares to play this game again.

    So, maybe it’s time to draw post-Europe borders now that european governance has become malignant, I don’t believe it can be saved. This always ends up happenning so might as well hit that reset button early while they’re not seeing it coming this early.