I feel like there is no inbetween for tutorials. They ethier think you have only discovered computers and the internet today or that you know every programing language and have a CS PhD.
Sometimes both in the same article!
They’ll start by explaining what the internet is before descending into a dense conversation about how to use eBPF to do packet filtering and observability - just who is the audience that needs both halves of this?
Here‘s the kicker: some folks don’t even question how cars work, how the lights work, how their microwave works, yet all ot them have tutorials.
Now ask Annie what she thinks I should wear, and watch how those neurons fire up.
I’m aware
it’s satire.
But this a matter of selective bias. Like, who actually reads the tutorials on how to wash your clothes, and sunglasses ftm.Are you seriously complaining about women?
Click the spoiler.
That only made it worse. I’ll add misogynist to your already long tag of bad stuff.
? Are you now DigVicŋ me right now, or are you really incapable of reading satire?
🤞your not “White Awakening”.
I don’t know what you’re talking about, and that link is explains nothing.
Based on your post history, everything you say is how you feel and nothing you say is satire. The tag stays.
What part of selective biasing information are you projecting on me, that washing clothes tutorials is considered “about women”? Or that of fashion?
This is how I, a developer with 25 years’ experience, still read many software tutorials. And I have a relatively high tolerance for technical detail. Often it seems the person writing the tutorial is in too deep, and they should have got a friend to write it with their help.
🤝🫂
Worst part is when some folks are too smart, and the mirror effect isolates them from normal folks from forming zeitgeist friendships. 😭
I still get slack for contracting plain English. Not even 70 years ago, Americans where contracting even script!
Like, everyone lost intelligence as tools advanced. Why can’t scribes tier transpile my tutorials?
I appreciate comments like yours, and various others echoing the same sentiment in this thread and the HN thread. I’m far more proficient with techy stuff than the vast majority of people, but it’s easy to feel incompetent if you’re exposed to challenges outside of your primary domain (a feeling exacerbated by hanging out in spaces where most people seem to be super techy). It’s validating to hear that even people far more experienced than me struggle with tutorials sometimes.
Hey guys, I’m having trouble with step number 4. Here’s the error:
Error: doodlewhompus error static non-binging 0xdde0826 ()()<<<>>>>[][]{###{##{}%%^#^>>>~]]: No file inserted manifold juncture pocket grinder - You can fix this with a rematch janktown topple matrixJeez, RTFM loser. And don’t post again without including a full log, dump and stack trace that I’m not going to tell you how to create, or you’ll be banned. You’ll also be banned if you ask how to make those.
Have you tried reversing the polarity?
Oh, that yeah that just kinda happens just ignore it and continue(proceeds to Nuke Germany)
Step 4. Boop!
I felt like this trying to mod a game that wasn’t working through nexus mods vortex thing. I did get it to work. I felt no joy.
Ugh, this is exactly how I feel when it comes to modding games.
“You need RandomAndy’s Live Framework (RALF) version 2.01b. Don’t use 2.01c, it has issues, but some stuff is built for .c so make sure you check each component. Don’t download it from the main site though - it comes packaged with YAMP4A (Yet Another Mod Pack for Armour) so you don’t need to worry about it. Now to install my mod you need these three separate packages…”
Christ, this cannot be worth it.
You’re welcome
