I’m sure AIPAC has nothing to do with it
Oh, I know why!
It’s because neoliberalism is an ideology of the right, so they’d rather lose to someone on their right than work with someone to their left.
He’s far more concerned with protecting privilege than helping those without.
Don’t forget about that sweet AIPAC money.
At this point it’s not even neoliberalism anymore. It’s neoconservatism with the illusion of left-leaning ideology
His sponsors don’t like Mamdani. Simple as that. That’s who he works for.
You mean Joe and Eileen Bailey, the literally made up and imaginary couple that he created and claims are accurate representations of his constituents which he has referenced hundreds of times as justification for his positions?
I shit you not this is a real thing he does. Instead of listening to actual constituents he just makes ones up.
At this point, I hope he doesn’t. Schumer’s and Jeffries’ careers going down in flames ASAP would be a good thing.
Not fast enough. They’re enabling Trump
Is it aipac? It’s probably aipac
Cause he’s a
That’s all there is to it
Because the DNC is fully committed to the inertia of failed ideas, big money, and losing future elections.
It’s cause the Bailey’s haven’t told him if they like him, yet.
Well the Baileys actually are writing in Trump to be thr mayor of New York, so Schumer is considering his options there
I wonder if it’s related to the reason that he voted to make October 14th a special day for Charlie Kirk.
This mf is owned as well. It’s easy to see.
deleted by creator
They’re not the same as Republicans tho, they just fight against progress and a fair society while supporting dictatorships and oligarchies.
deleted by creator