• The Picard Maneuver@piefed.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      13 days ago

      I’m a fan of high speed rail too, but I also wonder if it’s ever going to be comparable to flying for long distances like this.

      Like, even traveling in a direct line on a plane (which averages 600mph, or 2-3x the average speed of high speed rail), it still takes 6 hours from NYC to LA.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Anything under about 500 km is better by train. While the train is slower, once you count getting to and from the airport and in and out of the plane, you’re still faster overall. Above that the plane will usually be faster. If you take the environmental cost into account, the train always wins.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        13 days ago

        There’s a direct train from Beijing to Kunming that’s 11 hours, 1700 miles.

        NYC to LA would be ~50% more, so you could do a high-speed sleeper.

        But no, at that distance, flying is probably better.

      • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        As soon as Elon Musk builds his Hyperloop, we’ll be traveling from NYC to LA in just a few hours. /s

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Honestly, if trains were 1/3 as fast as planes, I’d take them.

        My family lives about 800 miles away (by car, less as the crow flies), which takes about 14 hours by car, 2.5 hours by plane, and 45 hours by train (36 moving time). To be fair, it covers more ground (almost 2x at ~1400 miles), but driving that same roite would only be ~22 hours. To make up for the extra distance, the train would need to go about twice the speed, so 120-150mph, to match driving, which is completely feasible. If I could do that trip via train in one day, I’d do it vs taking the plane.

        I don’t think expecting trains to go 2-3x the speed of cars is unreasonable. I’d still probably take an airplane for longer trips, but anything within 1k miles or so should be reasonable to do by rail.

        • fullsquare
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          commercial planes are a bit subsonic, you’re asking for 300-400 km/h trains. high speed rail is like 200 km/h

          • Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 days ago

            Although it is true the definitions for high speed trains mention 200km/h, it is good to know many lines exist with 300km/h or above as speed limit (and the speed limit is regularly driven on these lines).

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            High speed rail is enough for medium size trips that I would normally drive. When driving isn’t feasible (more than 800 miles or so), I’d need faster than typical high speed rail.

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 days ago

        There is a point where planes become the better choice and transcontinental is definitely one of them.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      With the distances provided, flying would be faster than high speed rail. Even if there was a maglev train from NYC to Miami, I think the flight would still be faster unless there were major delays flying out.

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      You’d need a train going 1100mph (3x faster than the fastest current train) to make Miami to Las Vegas in 2 hours, but sure.

            • _stranger_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              It’s from an anime called Chainsaw Man.

              Fun fact: This scene is from the aftermath of the first and only attack by the devil named Gun, who stands in as a metaphor for gun violence (not very subtle, but that’s the point)

              • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                Lol, in the manga I think it was crazier than this. There was just an immense scar across an entire continent in a straight line, as if a mile wide bulldozer just drove across everything. I don’t remember if it targeted a government official or not, but I vaguely

                spoiler

                remember control planting a piece of the gun devil as a lure.