Is a tongue scraper really that much better than brushing your tongue?
isn’t going to magically emerge the ability to determine which statements are reasonable and/or true
You’re assuming P!=NP
I remember reading there was something like this back in the mid/late 00s too, maybe without the giftcards but you could sign up for email alerts when there was a forum thread that needed to be brigaded, long before even reddit was a thing.
Edit: read about it on Metafilter at the time but it seems to have been purged. If you’re interested maybe the post is findable on the Internet Archive
Biden’s going to sign that bill that equates criticizing Israel with antisemitism isn’t he?
Alex Jones’ well known statement that “they’re putting chemicals in the water that turn the fricking frogs gay” isn’t enough for them to support even the most basic environmental regulation.
A nice thought that there are inroads on the environment among the paranoid set of conservatives, maybe worth exploring. I recall studies showing some kinds of chemical effluent having gender based effects on fish at least, which might be the origin of Alex’s bizarre theory.
Plenty of people were collecting and posting evidence like this in the early/mid 00s, a lot of it’s probably still searchable if you want to comb through, I don’t know, the archives of fark.com, suck. com*, plastic. com*, I dunno a hundred other dusty forgotten forums. In many ways the internet we have today is structured to hide a lot of realizations people had in those times about the changes that happened under the Bush admin. The jet fuel line is just the echoes of crank theories that got turned into a joke meant to silence that effort.
*dead websites only available on the internet archive, the links probably go to something fucked up now so please don’t follow them
Curious who the last US president who meaningfully criticized Israel would have been. If I had to guess Biden is bound by defense treaties and other formal agreements, both public and covert, and has to walk a fine line in how he talks about this and other geopolitical matters.
Just because one financially doesn’t need to work doesn’t mean one is forbidden from doing so. Plenty of openings in retail with lots of opportunity for arguably meaningful human interaction.
Sounds like an admission of guilt
It doesn’t mention any historical examples from before 1990 due to cultural prejudice but I’d be shocked if the Greeks and Romans didn’t write on the subject, being such avid observers of the natural world. Sounds like a fun research project for a historian, I’m sure it’s out there.
Raccoons sound like dinasaurs killing each other in a black and white movie no joke they are not quiet beasties
Left?
Haven’t seen the documentary but would be great to have an annotated list of accounts of gay animals from throughout history to point people towards so they can’t say its chemicals in the water or microplastics turning animals gay in the current era.
Glowing blue or white is still safe though, right?
Was Trump’s $10 billion Foxconn facility built? Is it thriving today?
Edit: googled and answered my own question, it was never built.
Tangentially that libreddit site you linked, it’s a reddit mirror, right? First I’m seeing it but that color scheme and font is very 1997 in a good way.
Does Biden support it? I haven’t seen any evidence he plans on signing it (or anything to the contrary, either)
Several Democrats and Republicans have indicated they’d vote against it but is it reasonable to expect it will get through the Senate?
My working theory is he’s been struggling with some kind of Long COVID since he caught it around the time of the 2020 presidential debates.
#2 really but with a partner is better. Fun aesthetic imo