It sorts by what seems to me historically by relevance, i.e. which day is asked more often because it seems a more frequent timeframe for everyday use in a medieval society compared to the month (with the seasons as something in between those two).

And I agree that since the digital age yyyy-mm–dd has significant advantages!

It really becomes time that it’s been made clear about that! It’s unbelievable that it took so long for someone to call out that it’s the time the It is referring to!

(Now I wait for some nerd to clear up each reference point because I only wrote that because I had the first two parte in my head when I reset your reply!)

I really like the question, thank you! The answer is a clear “yes, but”:

Your assumption is absolutely correct, light surfaces reflect more light back and heat up less because of this.

Noe if your display heats up less depends on the amount of energy it uses to generate that white:

For an e ink display it would be basically the same as a bright vs dark paper of the same color. But OLED for example uses constant energy to generate the white image: So it’s depending on how bright the sun shines vs how much heat gets generated by the display itself.

Still only looking at the sun’s energy it would be smaller. If the overall temperature would be lower depends on exactly how bright the sun would be vs how efficient the specific display is!

Raising it lowering the container works only if it is not protected from environmental pressure - but you’re right: creating two different pressure environments that are somehow connected is ready in a thought experiment but then you tell that to the engineer and they get their third heart attack of the week…

I’m writing only based on your text, not the video, please excuse any doubling of content.

It is easier explained if you build an imaginary machine instead of lifting / lowering that does the same thing. The single most important thing to understand is that the lower the pressure the less heat you need to add to boil something. There are funny graphs for each liquid (for example https://courses.lumenlearning.com/umes-cheminter/chapter/vapor-pressure-curves/ ).

The intro explanation

The water in your containers will behave based on their individual combination of pressure and temperature. I’d at any point the water vapor falls below its boiling point at the current pressure it starts to form a liquid. At this point you’ve made a fancy rain machine.

Note that water itself adds pressure to a system because of its volume even as a gas

A machine

Imagine you have a container at 100 mmHg which according to a random online calculator leads to a boiling temperature of 50 degrees C.

Now you heat this up and lead the water vapor into another chamber which has only s pressure of 10 mmHg. Water has a boiling temperature of only a bit over 10C there! So you keep it at 20C to be sure the water never gets liquid again.

But wait: now you’re adding water vapor into a low pressure container - you’re literally pressing a gas into it - so you increase the pressure in there.

The first container, the source of the gas, becomes irrelevant: As soon as the additional water increases the pressure to around 20mmHg it starts condensation again as now it’s boiling point moved above the 20 degrees.

The flaws

As you’ve asked for the downsides: it’s a very convoluted way of manipulating water to achieve the same result as simply heating it. You would need way more energy to lift the containers far enough or otherwise decrease the pressure than the energy needed to boil it.

Other than energy and logistics I don’t see a downside. Liquids don’t behave differently in terms of boiling no matter the source: pressure, temperature or a combination.

The thing limiting it most is the last sentence, the rest I’ve seen as well :D

You put the finger in the wound with that ruleset though - first the negative of what you’ve said:

if you don’t allow debt to be calculated against you fuck Up people who literally want to invest in their future (buying machinery for their dream job for example).

If you do allow debt dedication then you get the status quo: oh I do owe a yacht but I have w huge debt on that - sure I have a collateral against that debt but here is clever accounting and suddenly the net worth of the billionaire is negative on paper.

I really like what you’ve described, I only lack the fantasy on how to avoid this banking exploitation by peiple who are smarter and more ruthless than me. :(

Old knowledge disclaimer, but if they didn’t change it then:

Because Apple literally tells people that they’re not allowed to charge less somewhere else - at least that was the case several years ago…

Sent you the account, sounds like an exciting learning project that could turn out to be useful as a side effect! ❤️

This question is a highly personal one from my perspective. I haven’t used the groups yet but I often toggle between six or seven contexts throughout the day and I’ll give them a shot for that.

Profiles toggling just didn’t work for me as it was too … Slow for me as in I have to reorientate myself whenever I switched profiles.

Tab groups are built for open tabs, bookmarks are built for revisiting things. Their use cases are quite different in my opinion.

In this reply you you talked about “some breads”, the OP Post only talks about bread - and that for sure had only ingredients in using at home.

Same for French fries: potato, salt, fat .

I’m with the poor downvoted fellow, I don’t understand where the risk comes from when it’s described this vague.

Are home made burgers better? Is it the freezing process and I should lower my meal prep? Is it additives?

Hey,

I’d be very grateful if you could share your approach den if it’s only to compare (I went with a “be assertive and clear, skip all overhead” system prompt.

This is not only interesting for chatgpt but understanding how people solve these issues comes in handy when switching to local variants as well!

Thanks in advance

The impulse to start talking or interrupting people you can pin to ADHD no problem - but tunnel firing for a whole dialogue discussing a problem?

Yes there is but it’s because of German law in they regard. And as it has to be approved by a governance body in public there is no chance of obfuscating it.

Normally that is a good thing from my point of view as it prevent shady weapons deals - but this is not a normal situation :(

It’s cheap and uninteresting clickbait.

Why do you assume that the downvotes are “I don’t understand this” instead of “this is spammy bullshit”?

I disagree: there are no stupid questions - but there are loaded questions, questions with wrong assumptions baked in or statements with a questionmark attached.

Small difference but I found my life way better when differentiating between “person doesn’t know l” and “person wants to be a troll”.

Correct - I wanted to compare my Spotify playlists with the alternatives but qobuz wants a credit card before allowing you to check their offer… Won’t do that.

Did qobuz by now implement a way to check their catalogue without agreeing to an abo?

I won’t switch to a company that obfuscates their offer behind a paywall.

Depends on your job and needs.

Sadly, yes. I know several people who found their job on LinkedIn in OPs country for example(sampling warning: because I have close ties to an Austrian company recruiting actively there).

I see the problem similar to the fediverse: for mass attraction you need either mass or a selling point. LinkedIn at least has the numbers…

I’m annoyed by it every time I have to open it but there are too many business ties to just dump for me and I don’t have the influence to convince anyone to change communication platforms.

All of that is my profession bubble of course.