Ok you’re not reading so I’m not going to respond. Either read the thread and respond to the thread or stop talking to me.

I’ve never seen anyone die, does that mean they don’t?

For all I know there are living people and there are corpses but they are different things.

What about that was derogatorily?

And also how is that sucking a dick?

This is sucking a dick, silly: 🍆😯, or 🍆🫦

I don’t even know how that can be considered derogatory, it’s something pretty much every adult on the planet has either seen or done or received, seems ridiculous to say it’s homophobic.

But I didnt call anyone a removed

So: what the actual fuck are you guys talking about?

Vegan tofu eggs are actually pretty good, you use this sulphur salt to add the flavors. But you can’t do a fried egg, just scrambled, which ruins the experience. However I’m totally fine with eating eggs because eggs aren’t alive. Vegan bacon is a crime against humanity, but maybe one day it won’t be. Veggie sausages are solid. So…yeah you can mostly assemble it.

As the world dies I’m hoping we figure out some better veggie options (not necessarily meat substitutes, just interesting things to do with veggies).

I’m not repeating this conversation with someone who is as openly aggressive as you out of the gate. Read the rest of this comment chain.

Ok let’s ignore that for a second and focus in on your homophobia. What precisely about that message is homophobic?

I like that you didn’t even settle on one, you’re just like “I don’t like this😭😭😭, let me grab a few misc words and chain them together”.

I mean, I get it. There’s no meaning behind the message so you have to put together several fake meanings and hope they stick.

Accurate, meat is universally gross

More fun if you go via the neck

So who do you stand with?

That having been said I don’t actually know why you’re responding to me. It sounds like you have some kind of actual evidence backing up your beliefs (whatever those beliefs may be) which means you don’t fall into the category of stupid we were discussing.

🤢

It makes the road surface slicker, as I said.

Nowhere did I support Texas

Nowhere did I say the way that crosswalks are is bad

I said maybe having a slicker than usual stretch of road leading up to a crosswalk would be bad, which isn’t what’s happening

What’s more, you literally have a response next to mine on this subthread where you are clearly in agreement with me.

https://vger.to/lemmy.myserv.one/comment/16401772

Should be illegal everywhere

This is so much worse

Based on a sample of 1, we have determined that the human race should no longer exist.

Goodbye

Your words say leaders but your words say not leaders

Another solid argument that gets right to the real point of all this.

Makes sense, thanks for the explanation

No, he said everything else is some type of castle. I looked this castle up and it aligns well with the idea that he’s trying to shut down the other claims without considering them.

From the wiki:

where an arguer conflates two positions that share similarities: one modest and easy to defend (the “motte”) and one much more controversial and harder to defend (the “bailey”)

So he’s technically saying that the rest of the post is modest claims which are easy to defend, ie he agrees with Y. (I’m assuming the bailey is genocide and the motte is the claims of ethnic cleansing w/out genocide)