deleted by creator

  • @Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    🤭yea, and what are we gonna do against it?

    We manage everything with azure group policies (therefore use all microsoft). we don’t want an extra system to manage the browser of the employees. Maybe corporations are save from that just a while longer than private user 🤔

      • @Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        Of course, but extra work is required for third party browsers vs just using windows built in browser designed to be managed using entraID / intune.

        Companies don’t like to pay extra.

        • @Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          It’s no different than controlling add-ons via GPO like we did in the old days of on-prem. No extra cost associated.

            • @Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              14 months ago

              Your outsourced IT provider charges for simple configuration changes? That’s a yikes from me. I worked in MSPs for years and those sort of changes were always covered in the standard contract.

              • @Petter1@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                14 months ago

                You got me there 🤭I don’t see in exact contract with the provider, I only worked with them on some projects (like enterprise wifi via TLS)
                But the one in charge of decision making depending IT is fan of the MS ecosystem.
                Personally I work with friends to offer workplace in the cloud in the future, like having a complete OS within a browser tab.