• @kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    685 days ago

    Python is easy, but it can also be infuriating. Every time I use it, I’m reminded how much I loathe the use of whitespace to define blocks, and I really miss the straightforward type annotations of strong, non-dynamically typed languages.

      • @kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        84 days ago

        Oh, I know you can, but it’s optional and the syntax is kind of weird. I prefer languages that are strongly typed from the ground up and enforce it.

        • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 days ago

          Python is strongly typed, it’s just not statically typed. Python with consistent type hinting is extremely similar to a statically typed language like C#.

          • @kescusay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 days ago

            I would argue that without consistent and enforced type hinting, dynamically typed languages offer very little benefit from type-checking at runtime. And with consistent, enforced type hinting, they might as well be considered actual statically typed languages.

            Don’t get me wrong, that’s a good thing. Properly configured Python development environments basically give you both, even if I’m not a fan of the syntax.

            • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              14 days ago

              What’s wrong with the syntax? It’s just var_name: Type = value, it’s very similar to Go or Rust. Things get a little wonky with generics (list[Type] or dict[Type]), but it’s still similar to other languages.

              One nice thing about it being runtime checked is you can accept union types, def func(param: int | float), which isn’t very common in statically typed languages.