• @kescusay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      84 days ago

      Oh, I know you can, but it’s optional and the syntax is kind of weird. I prefer languages that are strongly typed from the ground up and enforce it.

      • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 days ago

        Python is strongly typed, it’s just not statically typed. Python with consistent type hinting is extremely similar to a statically typed language like C#.

        • @kescusay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 days ago

          I would argue that without consistent and enforced type hinting, dynamically typed languages offer very little benefit from type-checking at runtime. And with consistent, enforced type hinting, they might as well be considered actual statically typed languages.

          Don’t get me wrong, that’s a good thing. Properly configured Python development environments basically give you both, even if I’m not a fan of the syntax.

          • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 days ago

            What’s wrong with the syntax? It’s just var_name: Type = value, it’s very similar to Go or Rust. Things get a little wonky with generics (list[Type] or dict[Type]), but it’s still similar to other languages.

            One nice thing about it being runtime checked is you can accept union types, def func(param: int | float), which isn’t very common in statically typed languages.