@Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-23 days agoStudy finds smartphone bans in Dutch schools improved focuswww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1355arrow-down10cross-posted to: world@lemmy.worldeurope@feddit.org
arrow-up1355arrow-down1external-linkStudy finds smartphone bans in Dutch schools improved focuswww.reuters.com@Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-23 days agomessage-square48fedilinkcross-posted to: world@lemmy.worldeurope@feddit.org
minus-square@slackassassin@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 days agoYes, it does. A subjective response can absolutely be an objective result.
minus-square@ClusterBomb@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 day agoThis is not a demonstration and this does not qualify as a scientific proof. 🤷 They polled teachers. It ir like I polled religious and conclude that God exists because God speaks to most of the people I polled. This is not science, sorry not sorry.
minus-square@slackassassin@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 day agoGood example! That poll would be a relevant result for a percent of the population the believes in god.
Yes, it does. A subjective response can absolutely be an objective result.
This is not a demonstration and this does not qualify as a scientific proof. 🤷
They polled teachers. It ir like I polled religious and conclude that God exists because God speaks to most of the people I polled. This is not science, sorry not sorry.
Good example! That poll would be a relevant result for a percent of the population the believes in god.