awful.systems
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
@AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish • 4 months ago

Asimov missed something

lemmy.world

message-square
48
fedilink
1.19K

Asimov missed something

lemmy.world

@AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish • 4 months ago
message-square
48
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • @hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    115•4 months ago

    I think that means they could rip out your eye balls to prevent you from seeing ads.

    • Pennomi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71•4 months ago

      Whatever it takes

    • @InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39•4 months ago

      Robot is allowed to kill a human to prevent a viewing of an advertisement.

      • Ioughttamow
        link
        fedilink
        27•4 months ago

        Under the zeroth law they can just kill the advertiser as a last resort

        • @InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7•4 months ago

          Ohhh yes

        • @Klear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4•4 months ago

          Good start, but can we change that to “first resort”?

      • metaStatic
        link
        fedilink
        12•4 months ago

        A truly moral use case of the hanibal directive

      • @Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2•4 months ago

        Okay, proposed second law: A robot may not harm or kill a human unless it violates the first law.

    • @The25003@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7•4 months ago

      This is a solid premise for a pretty metal music video.

    • dohpaz42
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5•4 months ago

      Thankfully the wording is “shown” and not “seen”. I believe our eyeballs are safe… for now.

    • @PattyMcB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2•4 months ago

      I think Asimov would agree

  • Chloé 🥕
    link
    fedilink
    English
    103•4 months ago
    1. a robot’s eyes must always turn red when they go evil
    • @EpicMuch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46•4 months ago

      God bless the designer who always installs the blue AND red LEDs inside the eyes

      • NaibofTabr
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15•
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        For giving the robots freedom of choice?

        Because obviously if they didn’t install the red ones then the robot could never be evil.

        • @Nelots@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8•4 months ago

          That’s exactly what an evil robot without red LEDs would want us to think.

      • ⛓️‍💥
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10•4 months ago

        Full RGB

    • @AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22•4 months ago

      Right, because it’s hard to make a robot grow a goatee.

      • DasFaultier
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5•4 months ago

        Bender-flexo.jpg

        • @deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5•4 months ago

          Bender was the evil bender!?

  • @DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    66•4 months ago

    I’d argue that advertisements fall under “A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.”

    • Programmer Belch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38•4 months ago

      Psychic damage is real damage

      • @applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14•4 months ago

        Emotional damage

      • @herrvogel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5•4 months ago

        This is canon in the books. There is one short story where one robot bends over backwards trying to spare humans from emotional pain. Hilarity ensues.

  • pruwyben
    link
    fedilink
    English
    59•
    edit-2
    4 months ago
    1. A machine must never prompt a human with options of “Yes” and “Maybe later” - they must always provide a “No” option.
  • sp3ctr4l
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25•
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I am very close to adopting the ideals of the Dune universe, post Butlerian Jihad:

    “Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind.”

    Mainly because, us, humans, are very evidently too malicious and incompetent to be trusted with the task.

    • @Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2•4 months ago

      Waow (based based based based)

  • @StellarExtract@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14•
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    How about “a robot must have complete loyalty to its owner, even if this is not in the best interests of its manufacturer”. Fat chance, I know.

    • @ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1•4 months ago

      Owner loyalty is a subscription service, natch.

  • Fontasia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12•4 months ago

    I love it when posts line up like that

  • @MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11•4 months ago

    No he didn’t. The laws were a plot device meant to have flaws.

  • @SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10•4 months ago

    Advertisements are now everything but visual. Sounds, smells, tastes, touch, the way the pavement vibrates as a train goes past…

  • @rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9•4 months ago

  • @dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8•4 months ago

    Can we just agree that adverisements in general is harmful? So the original first (and zeroth) law is applicable.

  • @PattyMcB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6•4 months ago

    Love the username, OP!

  • Ioughttamow
    link
    fedilink
    6•4 months ago

    Let’s introduce musk to the zeroth law

  • @Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5•4 months ago

    And that includes offers to subscribe to Laws of Robotics Premium.

    Yes, Amazon. They’re still adverts, and you can still go and fucking fuck yourselves.

  • @protonslive@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5•4 months ago

    I don’t know. “Must not kill us, somehow sounds important”

    • @Rusty@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10•4 months ago

      It’s good, but the one about the ads should be higher on the priority list.

    • @Rin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2•4 months ago

      suicide bots sound kinda cool tho 🤔

Microblog Memes@lemmy.world

!microblogmemes@lemmy.world

remote_follow_modal_title

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !microblogmemes@lemmy.world

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, Twitter X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

  • !whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
  • !curatedtumblr@sh.itjust.works
  • 3.1K users / day
  • 7.18K users / week
  • 13.2K users / month
  • 25.9K users / 6 months
  • 8.19K subscribers
  • 1.79K Posts
  • 48.9K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Ready! Player 31
  • @aeronmelon@lemmy.world
  • @needanke@feddit.org
  • BE: 0.19.3
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org