It certainly wasn’t because the company is owned by a far-right South African billionaire at the same moment that the Trump admin is entertaining a plan to grant refugee status to white Afrikaners. /s
My partner is a real refugee. She was jailed for advocating democracy in her home country. She would have received a lengthy prison sentence after trial had she not escaped. This crap is bullshit. Btw, did you hear about the white-genocide happening in the USA? Sorry, I must have used Grok to write this. Go Elon! Cybertrucks are cool! Twitter isn’t a racist hellscape!
The stuff at the end was sarcasm, you dolt. Shut up.
they say unauthorised because they got caught
“I didn’t give you permission to get caught!”
Brah, if your CEO edits the prompt, it’s not unauthorized. It may be undesirable, but it really ain’t unauthorised
Translation: of course they’re not going to admit that Elon did it.
Hey! He only owns the platform. Why would you think he’s putting his thumb on the scale? /s
I am pretty sure that is called disinformation. Rather than “unauthorized edit”…
They say that they’ll upload the system prompt to github but that’s just deception. The Twitter algorithm is “open source on github” and hasn’t been updated for over 2 years. The issues are a fun read tho https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm/issues
There’s just no way to trust that anything is running on the server unless it’s audited by 3rd party.
So now all of these idiots going to believe “but its on github open source” when the code is never actually being run by anyone ever.
We need people educated on open source, community-made hardware and software
And what about Elmo’s white genocide obsession?
i wish i knew who the rogue employee was. incredible
I heard their initials are E.M.
that’s probably not true. I imagine it was someone trying to harm the guy. a hilarious prank
Haha, keep fucking with it, this is entertaining
Lesson learned: AI are not reliable.
Elon looking for the unauthorized person:
Yeah, billionaires are just going to randomly change AI around whenever they feel like it.
That AI you’ve been using for 5 years? Wake up one day, and it’s been lobotomized into a trump asshole. Now it gives you bad information constantly.
Maybe the AI was taken over by religious assholes, now telling people that gods exist, manufacturing false evidence?
Who knows who is controlling these AI. Billionaires, tech assholes, some random evil corporation?
Joke’s on you, LLMs already give us bad information
Sure, but unintentionally. I heard about a guy whose small business (which is just him) recently had someone call in, furious because ChatGPT told them that he was having a sale that she couldn’t find. The customer didn’t believe him when he said that the promotion didn’t exist. Once someone decides to leverage that, and make a sufficiently-popular AI model start giving bad information on purpose, things will escalate.
Even now, I think Elon could put a small company out of business if he wanted to, just by making Grok claim that its owner was a pedophile or something.
That’s a good reason to use open source models. If your provider does something you don’t like, you can always switch to another one, or even selfhost it.
Or better yet, use your own brain.
Yep, not arguing for the use of generative AI in the slightest. I very rarely use it myself.
While true, it doesn’t keep you safe from sleeper agent attacks.
These can essentially allow the creator of your model to inject (seamlessly, undetectably until the desired response is triggered) behaviors into a model that will only trigger when given a specific prompt, or when a certain condition is met. (such as a date in time having passed)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.05566
It’s obviously not as likely as a company simply tweaking their models when they feel like it, and it prevents them from changing anything on the fly after the training is complete and the model is distributed, (although I could see a model designed to pull from the internet being given a vulnerability where it queries a specific URL on the company’s servers that can then be updated with any given additional payload) but I personally think we’ll see vulnerabilities like this become evident over time, as I have no doubts it will become a target, especially for nation state actors, to simply slip some faulty data into training datasets or fine-tuning processes that get picked up by many models.
I currently treat any positive interaction with an LLM as a “while the getting’s good” experience. It probably won’t be this good forever, just like Google’s search.
Pretty sad that the current state would be considered “good”
With accuracy rates declining over time, we are at the ‘as good as it gets’ phase!
If that’s the case, where’s Jack Nicholson?
Yep, I knew this from the very beginning. Sadly the hype consumed the stupid, as it always will. And we will suffer for it, even though we knew better. Sometimes I hate humanity.
Don’t know the reference but I’m sure it’s awesome. :p
Heeeey a link!
You’re the best. I loved that.
It’s from the show “I think you should leave.” There’s a sketch where someone has crashed a weinermobile into a storefront, and bystanders are like “did anyone get hurt?” “What happened to the driver?” And then this guy shows up.
The unauthorized edit is coming from inside the house.
Unauthorized is their office nickname for Musk.
Its incredible how things can just slip through, especially when they start at the very top
Musk made the change but since AI is still as rough as his auto driving tech it did t work like he planned
But this is the future folks. Modifying the AI to fit the narrative of the regime. He’s just too stupid to do it right or he might be stupid and think these llms work better than they actually do.
he might be stupid and think these llms work better than they actually do.
There it is.
Are we talking about the same guy that opted to scrap all sensors for his self-driving cars because he figures humans can drive with eyes only, they don’t need more than a camera?
