• @calcopiritus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    226 days ago

    My gf knows nothing about math. And has to learn a bit. I’m a software engineer so of course I offered to teach her.

    Gave her some exercises to do. Because she prefers to do them alone without help. And after 30 minutes she’s like “can you help me decipher what chatgpt told me?”.

    Of course, what chatgpt told her was utter garbage. Bruh, I’m right here and I’m teaching you, just ask me for help, not a word predictor.

    I’m actually impressed how bad chatgpt answered, this was low high school level maths/physics. The bot is advertised as if it were going to leave me without a job in the next year.

    • @Soleos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      56 days ago

      Your GF secretly works for openAI. You’re not teaching her, she’s getting you to train chatGPT :O

  • @buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    96 days ago

    I would have asked, “And what exactly does ChatGPT think it is?” Because there’s a pretty good chance that it made up a definition that is 100% bullshit.

  • @andybytes@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    77 days ago

    Well our society is falling apart as we barrel towards another great war with the most certainly a expectation that Yankeeland is gonna drop a nuke on a civilian population. There will be conscripts and consequences. Oh yeah let’s not forget arresting the homeless and giving them felonies and throwing them into for profit prisons. Lets not forget the hooverviles. But sure you’re a top G with your illgotten gains with a currency that is rapidly declining. What a limp dick techchoad dum dumb culture. Drinking from a poisoned well were the bully gets you to punch yourself in your own face and you celebrate this. We celebrate this world of the lowest common denominator. We eat our own. This is a empty vessel of lesser things. A pit of despair… A whoreable land that is hostile to real innovation and creativity. We all are nothing but dildos for the capitalist. It would be better to be closer to the blast zone. The rich have bunkers and we all will starve to death. Capitalism is a death cult and shorting is gambling with your children’s future. Only the most idiotic will replicate. This seems now a activity for the most supremely vain, non mathmatical and selfish. Thank gawd all men die.

    • xor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67 days ago

      This is a very intense, and worryingly doomer response to someone vaguely mentioning the concept of short selling

    • @VerbFlow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 days ago

      If you could just go outside and talk to some friends, that’d massively improve your situation. Just give small talk to somebody. Somebody real. They’ll cheer you up. You could also find a homeless shelter to volunteer at.

      I mean, I understand things are awful, with global warming and forced deportations, but this lachrymose screed isn’t what life is like. There are countless people all over the world who are creative, kind, and full of hope, and we are merely beset by great problems.

  • @solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1327 days ago

    it only takes a couple times of getting a made-up bullshit answer from chatgpt to learn your lesson of just skip asking chatgpt anything altogether

    • @HollowNaught@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 days ago

      I feel like a lot of people in this community underestimate the average person’s willingness to trust an AI. Over the past few months, every time I’ve seen a coworker ask something and search it up, I have never seen them click on a website to view the answer. They’ll always take what the AI summary tells them at face value

      Which is very scary

    • @SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 days ago

      My girlfriend gave me a mini heart attack when she told me that my favorite band broke up. Turns out it was chat gpt making shit up, came up with a random name for the final album too.

    • I stopped using it when I asked who I was and then it said I was a prolific author then proceeded to name various books I absolutely did not write.

    • @papalonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      137 days ago

      I was using it to blow through an online math course I’d ultimately decided I didn’t need but didn’t want to drop. One step of a problem I had it solve involved finding the square root of something; it spat out a number that was kind of close, but functionally unusable. I told it it made a mistake three times and it gave a different number each time. When I finally gave it the right answer and asked, “are you running a calculation or just making up a number” it said that if I logged in, it would use real time calculations. Logged in on a different device, asked the same question, it again made up a number, but when I pointed it out, it corrected itself on the first try. Very janky.

      • @stratoscaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        77 days ago

        ChatGPT doesn’t actually do calculations. It can generate code that will actually calculate the answer, or provide a formula, but ChatGPT cannot do math.

      • OpenStars
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 days ago

        So it forced you to ask it many times? Now imagine that you paid for it each time. For the creator then, mission fucking accomplished.

    • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Or you could learn to use the tool better and ask better questions. It’s pretty decent at some things, absolutely terrible for others.

      Asking to explain something like shorting a stock is one of the better uses, since there are tons of relevant posts explaining exactly that.

      • Match!!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 days ago

        It’s a good tool so long as there are already better ways to get your answer

        • It’s good if the answers exist, but you don’t know how to find them. They’re like search engines that can generated related terms. or regurgitate common answers.

          I find LLMs help me use existing search engines a lot better, because I can usually get it to spit out domain-specific terms to a more general query.

      • @Godric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        37 days ago

        I’m dying laughing at the “NOOOOO AI BAAAAAAD” folks downvoting you for being absolutely correct on how to use the tool properly XD

        • Eh, it comes w/ the territory. Lemmy is generally anti-LLM, and this is a post that would specifically trigger people who hate LLMs.

          I just hope a few people stop and think about whether their distaste for LLMs is reasonable or just bandwagoning.

          • @Godric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            27 days ago

            Yeah, my big gripe with Lemmy is the hivemind that decides the " ideologically correct" way to post. One can hope one reaches an open mind at some point, but such is social media :/

            • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              6
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              That’s true of all social media. It turns out, collecting information into groups tends to attract people w/ strong opinions about that type of information. If you have two groups, one very positive about something and one very negative, they’ll form separate groups because people prefer validation to conflict. It’s the natural consequence of social media, people like to form groups w/ like-minded people.

              I didn’t come to Lemmy because I disliked the Reddit hive-mind issue, I came because I disliked how they treated third party developers and volunteer moderators. I self-corrected for Reddit’s hive-mind by joining a bunch of subreddits that attracted different perspectives (i.e. some for leftists, some for conservatives, some for anarchists, etc) so I’d hopefully get a decent mix, and I do the same here on Lemmy (though it seems Lemmy is a bit more leftist than Reddit, so there’s a bit less diversity in politics at least). I do the same for news sources and in my use of LLMs (ask it to find issues w/ a previous answer it gave).

              So I sometimes post alternative viewpoints in threads like these to hopefully give someone a chance to reconsider their opinions. Sometimes those comments get traction, sometimes they don’t, but hopefully someone down the line will see them and appreciate it.

    • @stratoscaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      27 days ago

      I’ve only really found it useful when you provide the source of information/data to your prompt. E.g. say you want to convert one data format to another like table data into JSON

      It works very consistently in those types of use cases. Otherwise it’s a dice roll.

    • Ricky Rigatoni
      link
      fedilink
      17 days ago

      That’s what people get when they ask me questions too but they still bother me all the time so clearly that’s not going to work.

      • @Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 days ago

        No.

        With regular investing, you buy an asset (e.g. a share for $10) and sell it later. The most you can lose is that $10.

        With shorting you borrow a share for $10, and sell it. Then you buy it back later and give the share back. The idea being that you buy it back for $8 and you’ve made $2 profit. But what if the price suddenly rockets up to $100? Now you’ve lost $90. More than your initial stake.

      • @kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        87 days ago

        So is a lot of types of investing, so that’s really not a good definition, and just like investing if you know what you are doing you can come out way ahead with an almost guarantee with shorting

        • @Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          97 days ago

          Investing in any single thing is gambling in my book.

          Sure, it can pay off, but it can go badly too, and “knowing what you’re doing” is what everyone thinks they’re doing, right up to the point where they don’t.

          Although shorting Tesla might not be a bad plan right about now. Seeing Trump and Musk destroy each other is what I live for.

          • @kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            77 days ago

            Shorting tesla might not seem a bad plan for about a decade now, the market can remain illogical longer than the premiums you pay on the short position.

            Well you can also have “know how” from other things, for example years ago I was following a lot of PC hardware news and for me it was sure as fuck that both AMD and Nvidia will only increase for a while, Ryzen was starting to go strong and Intel was not putting up competition, and the then crypto market nicely transitioned into AI for keeping demand for Nvidia products high af.

            Anyone who knew someone from the boeing factories or had knowledge of what went on in that company likely should have known to short the shit out of the boeing stock the moment the first 787 Max went down.

            Really the stock market involves a lot of paying attention to stuff and then trying to to bet on the more likely stuff, it’s never a guarantee is it.

            Right now I am mostly paying attention to the car market, there I would say shorting US car manufacturers is a decent bet, Nissan if the stock is still low is a decent investment target, I don’t think they will go under and they have some nice cars at good prices.

            Stellantis went through a bit of turbulence, but they are coming out with some good stuff now, so they could see some upswing.

            But really I haven’t even looked at the stock prices so this might be all stupid shit.

            If you don’t want to gamble just invest in ETFs every month and you will be fine.

            • Tar_Alcaran
              link
              fedilink
              27 days ago

              If you don’t want to gamble just invest in ETFs every month and you will be fine.

              I mean, that’s still gambling. If you invest in a world-wide, well-spread, low-cost ETF, you’re essentially betting that the worldwide economy will grow faster than inflation+costs.

              That’s a pretty safe bet, but still a bet.

              • ඞmir
                link
                fedilink
                16 days ago

                That’s a pretty safe bet, but still a bet.

                Depends on how much your national government taxes investment compared to savings account. Here the difference means it’s the same expected value just with more variance

        • @piccolo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          77 days ago

          Correct me of im wrong. But cant you lose an infinite amount if the stock rockets up and the share owners comes asking their shares back?..

          • Tar_Alcaran
            link
            fedilink
            47 days ago

            Well, if it went up an infinite amount, then yes. In reality, that’s pretty unlikely

          • @ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            16 days ago

            It’s never really “infinite” in practice. What it really means is that the amount you can lose isn’t bound by the money you put into the trade. If you buy a stock normally, you can only lose up to the amount of money you used to buy it. With shorting, you can lose 5x, 10x, 20x the amount of money if things go wrong for you.

        • @Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          17 days ago

          In a similar vein to the other person responding to you, how exactly does one ‘know what they’re doing’ on the stock market without being tied in to VC firms, etc.?

          • @kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            57 days ago

            If you aren’t a trader you likely don’t know and therefore you shouldn’t go around shorting shit, or if you do post your losses on the wallstreetbets community on lemmy or reddit if there is no lemmy version

            • @Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              No I’m not exactly interested in shorting, I didn’t get wound up with the apes on Reddit. I’m mostly just curious, I don’t understand it.

              Edit: I understand what shorting is, I do not understand why shorting happens to the companies it happens to.

              • @iii@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                16 days ago

                I understand what shorting is, I do not understand why shorting happens to the companies it happens to.

                People believing the current price to be higher than the future price.

                • @Jax@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  6 days ago

                  But is that it? Isn’t shorting entirely speculative and based on whether anyone is actually watching the stock closely? To my understanding, that was the reason VC firms chose businesses like Gamestop and BB&B to short. Am I wrong about this?

  • @darthelmet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    147 days ago

    People do know they could have just googled things and looked at the top results before right? Even with all the enshitification it’s gone through it will still usually yield something useful for any topic that isn’t super niche. Like if I search “shorting” the top 3 results are articles from Wikipedia, Investorpedia, (don’t know enough about it to know if it’s reliable) and Charles Schwab, a source with a conflict of interest since they probably sell that service, but they’re probably at least going to explain why you’d want to buy it from them, and then as a bonus the 4th result is an ELI5 Reddit thread, which while probably not the most reliable source of info, is probably about on the same level as randomly asking your SO about a topic which they’re not an expert in.

    • @Sc00ter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      67 days ago

      Just fyi investorpedia is reliable. Ive personally never found incorrect information there.

      Im not so sure id call schwab a conflict of interest exactly. They do provide the service, but financial institutions like that are not allowed to provide investing advice, so they cant upsell strategies like that. All they can do is explain it so that you know what strategy you want to pursue.

    • @Soapbox@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 days ago

      I too have wondered about this. I doubt I will ever think to ask a chatbot a thing I would normally just “google” using a search engine. Sifting through search results is a skill/habit honed over 25+ years that just makes more sense to me. I also don’t trust AI to answer correctly.