• DominusOfMegadeus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9012 days ago

      “But the results are objectively much worse than if I just did it myself, sir!”

        • @Carmakazi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4812 days ago

          American employers don’t even give you this anymore. You are escorted away by security and someone else empties your shit into a box and hands it to you in the lobby. They are very afraid of sabotage.

          • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3112 days ago

            Seems like in the USA everyone gets treated badly all of the time, except the very richest.

            • DominusOfMegadeus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1312 days ago

              Either that, or you make yourself indispensable. What the C-Suites do all day, I have no idea. Whatever it is isn’t working though.

          • @catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            912 days ago

            When did they ever? I remember when one of my parents got fired in the 90s, they sent the stuff from the desk in a box. Including the company desk phone!

      • Ulrich
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1812 days ago

        “No one cares about the quality of your work, only the quantity!”

  • @medem@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    143
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    I had an interesting conversation today with an acquaintance. He has sent his resumé to dozens of companies now. Most of them, but not all, corporate blobs.

    He wondered for a while just why the hell no one is even reaching out (he’s definitely qualified for most of the positions). He then came to the idea to ask a particular commercial Artificial Stupidity software to parse it. Most of those companies use that software, or at least that’s what the vendor says on its website. Turns out, that PoS software gets it all wrong. As in: everything. Positions and companies get mixed up, dates aren’t correctly registered, the job descriptions it claims to have understood only remotely match what he wrote. Read: things even the most junior programmer with two weeks of experience would get right.

    And it is getting used pretty much by every big firm out there.

    Oh and BTW: There is ONE correct answer to the phrase ‘using AI is no longer optional’ : Fuck you.

    • @surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3812 days ago

      That’s not AI. That’s just ATS. And it’s been shit for years. Definitely, definitely, make sure your resume is ATS compatible. Use the scanners.

    • Bobby Turkalino
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2812 days ago

      I’m gonna be looking for a new job soon and I’ve been reading stuff like this more & more. Makes me really scared. I guess reaching out to recruiters directly via LinkedIn is more important than ever. I also hope the AI software hasn’t made its way down to small/medium-sized companies yet, since those are the ones I’d rather work for anyways

      • @ramble81@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        612 days ago

        small/medium sized companies

        Sadly, those are worse. Since they don’t have the staff or expertise, most of the time they outsource to larger companies… that use AI. I’m almost 99% positive at this point if any of the sites use Workday, it’s getting parsed by an AI because that’s what ours does and it’s a PITA.

      • @ceenote@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Their hope is probably that AI can let current employees bear a greater workload so they can downsize.

        • tarknassus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1912 days ago

          Ding! Any gains in productivity will mean more work for less people.

          Anyone who can’t see this coming - I have several bridges for sale.

          • @localme@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 days ago

            Yeah and what it should mean is the same productivity (or slightly higher) over fewer hours worked. So everyone can get more of their lives back to go be happy and spend time with their friends and families. Or literally whatever else people would rather being doing besides working all the damn time.

        • Avid Amoeba
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 days ago

          This is the material explanation. They expect increased productivity and therefore higher output and therefore higher profits from the same workforce. Not necessarily to downsize. Downsizing or upsizing would be dictated by a combination of the realized productivity gains and the uptake of their products by the market.

      • @salacious_coaster@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1012 days ago

        Microsoft support was already mostly useless. So, yeah, a useless AI probably could replace that, but it would also probably be more expensive.

      • @leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        712 days ago

        Frankly, with the garbage Microsoft is producing these days, and the rate at which the quality, for lack of a better word, is degenerating, I’m starting to consider if LLM slop might actually be less worse…

      • @shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 days ago

        suits have been replacing long term essential employees with outsourced trash even before in name of global redundancy and efficiency. now they will just the ai buzz word to hide behind.

            • I Cast Fist
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1112 days ago

              Right now at least, AI is being more of a headache than anything in coding. Microsoft itself was responsible for one such gaffe in May, as an actual coder had to tell the AI to fix an error, again and again, as each time it’d make a different mistake

        • DominusOfMegadeus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1012 days ago

          I use ChatGPT to write code fairly often. Because I don’t know how. ChatGPT never gets it right the first time, usually doesn’t get it right by the 10th try, and will never stop going down a robot hole of inaccuracy until I give up. The only success I have had in recent memory was getting some custom commands written in Karabiner for my desktop mice.

  • @BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6312 days ago

    They must really want their workforce to be less efficient while dramatically lowering quality and security across the board.

    • @IllNess@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1611 days ago

      They are banking on the AI will eventually be smart enough that it will replace the workers that fed it.

    • @isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1411 days ago

      except programmers are gonna continue with what they were already doing, at most putting a script on copilot to get the metrics

      don’t forget that if you don’t turn in the project in time you’re fired, the issues always get thrown at the coder, it’s never the company’s fault

      • @absquatulate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Company I’m at also does the forced AI and it’s all but mandatory now. Problem is as code monkeys we’re past the point of heading down to the Winchester for a pint until it blows over. They’re pushing so hard in order to “not fall behind” that you literally can’t escape it. I think even malicious compliance won’t cut it. And when 8/10 companies that dictate the market say that “this is the future”, then this is the future they’ll make whether we like it or not.

        Edit: the silver lining is that we’re working with tools that are better than copilot at generating menial work like generating boilerplate code, unit tests, release notes, walls of text for app documentation etc.

          • @absquatulate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            211 days ago

            We’re in the honeymoon phase, shit didn’t hit the fan yet. Problem is we devs are fucked either way. If productivity does increase, then workforce demand will go down especially for entry level devs and seniors will be relegated to vibe coding and fixing AI bugs. If it all goes south then layoffs, because line must go up!

  • @TwitchingCheese@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5612 days ago

    Apparently no longer optional for their customers either, based on how hard they are pushing it in Office 365, sorry Microsoft 365, no sorry Microsoft 365 Copilot.

    The latest change of dumping you into a Copilot chat immediately on login and hiding all the actually useful stuff is just desperation incarnate.

    • @voluble@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1011 days ago

      The process to log in to the online portal of Outlook is so bad it’s crossed into comical territory. So much friction, only to shunt you to a full screen clippy copilot page.

      I’d be curious to know what the usage statistics are for that page. Like, what could a person possibly accomplish there?

  • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5312 days ago

    Same at my company. The frustrating part is they want us to use coding assistance, which is fine, but I really don’t code that much. I spend most of my time talking to other teams and vendors, reading docs, filing tickets, and trying to assign tasks to Jr devs. For AI to help me with that I need to either type all of my thoughts into the LLM which isn’t efficient at all or I need it to integrate with systems I’m not allowed to integrate with because there are SLOs that need to be maintained (i.e. can’t hammer the API and make others experience worse).

    So it’s pretty much the same as it’s always been. Instead of making a gallon of lemonade out of one lemon I need to use this “new lemonade machine” to start a multinational lemonade business.

    • @vaderaj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1412 days ago

      The key highlight being: you don’t need more than a gallon of lemonade. I for once wished big corps heard their engineers and domain experts over wall street loving exec’s.

      • Avid Amoeba
        link
        fedilink
        English
        511 days ago

        Why would they do that? If they’re making better quarterly results by listening to Wall St, that’s what the system tells them to do.

    • @RecallMadness@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      711 days ago

      Ditto.

      But I manage a team of embedded developers. On a specialised commercially restricted embedded platform.

      AI does not know a thing about our tech. The stuff it does know is either a violation of the vendors contractual covenants or made up bullshit. And Our vendor’s documentation is supplemented by a cumulative decades of knowledge.

      Yet still “you gotta use AI”.

  • @fum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5211 days ago

    This is ridiculous. Have people seen the recent AI code review from Audacity?? This whole AI bubble needs to burst already.

  • doctortofu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4212 days ago

    How very corporate of them: people don’t want to do something? Screw finding out why, let’s make it mandatory and poof, problem solved!

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      912 days ago

      Microsoft is in the process of downsizing to the tune of 3% of its global workforce and rising.

      Could be they really are unironically cruising towards a CEO overseeing a bunch of spam bot email accounts they’re treating as headcount.

  • @NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3511 days ago

    Yuuuup this is my company too. They’re monitoring our GH Copilot /Cursor usage and they’re going to apply to our performance reviews

    • @namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 days ago

      Really fascinating how this is happening in coordination all of a sudden. I’m practically certain that this is all coming from a small group of investors (maybe even just a couple) who are trying to influence companies as hard as they can into making everyone to start using it.

  • @AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2911 days ago

    As a heavy AI user on a daily basis…Copilot is hands down one of, if not the worst, in existence.

    This will not end well for them.

    • Mwa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 days ago

      Copilot is literally ChatGPT

    • @JamieT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 days ago

      Have found this too.

      We were only allowed to use Copilot at my last job, ChatGPT + the others were all blacklisted.

      We received SO many tickets from users across the organisation (including IT) requesting access to ChatGPT.

    • @FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 days ago

      If I ask copilot to help write a power automate script or similar, I guarantee it will not work. It won’t make sense. And if I do it from within power automate, it wants to replace what I already have there. It’s a mess.

      If I pull up chatgot on my phone (because it’s blacklisted at work) I will get very clear, step by step instructions that are usually good enough or occasionally not correct but close enough that I can tweak it back on course.

  • @RecallMadness@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2811 days ago

    While true; do curl http://copilot/?query=what+is+the+time; sleep 10; done

    Bet the AI can’t see through this.

    • @utopiah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 days ago

      Ironically enough that’s is exactly the kind of seemingly “simple” question a 4 years old could answer… but LLMs can’t.

      Asked my better half to test DeepSeek locally few months ago and they, without trying to “trick” it (as I would have tried) genuinely tried “What time is it in Sri Lanka?”. That made me smile because I was rather sure there was no way the model could answer that. It would need to know the current time on any time zone then, if it’s not in Sri Lanka already (which it wasn’t on my local system) would have to convert it. That would be very basic arithmetic (that some 4 years old could also do) but not “just” spitting back words related to the question.

      Guess what… it failed exactly as expected. The model replied back “information” (which is being generous for a string of words arguably related to the topic, which was mostly about Sri Lanka, not time) and yet was basically irrelevant and thus useless.

      So… yes I’m not actually sure CoPilot could even help there unless there is a lot of custom made handling of this kind of queries upstream!

    • Match!!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 days ago

      sleep 10? why not ddos your own company till copilot shuts you off

  • ddh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2512 days ago

    It’s called dog-slopping

    • dnzm
      link
      fedilink
      English
      911 days ago

      Dog-fooding, but instead of food, it’s a dog eating its own vomit.