• Grenfur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 months ago

      Here’s the thing. When I talk to friends interested in Linux, it’s always Debian or Fedora that I suggest. I think they draw a good line for what the average user wants and needs and they’re stable. In fact, I used Fedora for a long time, and all my homelab stuff runs Debian. It wasn’t until computers themselves became a hobby that I switched to Arch. And I think that’s likely the cutoff. If you’re a computer user, stable distros are great. If you’re more a hobbiest… Well, the Arch wiki can own your free time.

      • sunstoned@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        “Man I wish I could do more with my new computer” – Fedora

        “Yeah I just want to breathe some new life into this old laptop and have it last me until the end of time” – Debian

        • Fizz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Normal distro -> arch -> gentoo -> nixOS -> QubesOS -> Debian pipeline.

            • Fizz@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              Thats what you think you want but by the time you’re at the end of the pipeline you just want a computer that works.

              • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                So far, that’s exactly why I’ve stopped at Nix.

                Everything is declared exactly how I want it. If something would break, it just bails on the update. If I want to set up a new machine, I just clone my config and build it.

                I’m not sure what could be more “just works” than that.