awful.systems
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
artiman@piefed.social to Opensource@programming.devEnglish · 3 days ago

pfsense is open washing

github.com

external-link
message-square
15
link
fedilink
118
external-link

pfsense is open washing

github.com

artiman@piefed.social to Opensource@programming.devEnglish · 3 days ago
message-square
15
link
fedilink
GitHub - rapi3/pfsense-is-closed-source: The only purpose of this repository is to document the false advertising of the so-called "open-source" pfSense®™ project. Brought to you courtesy of Netgate/Rubicon Communications LLC/ Electric Sheep Fencing LLC.
github.com
external-link
The only purpose of this repository is to document the false advertising of the so-called "open-source" pfSense®™ project. Brought to you courtesy of Netgate/Rubicon Communications LLC/ E...
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • ulterno@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Feel free to make additions here: https://consumerrights.wiki/Netgate


    Clicking link leading to https://forum.netgate.com/#msg759561 and https://forum.netgate.com/#msg754001
    Gave me [[error:blacklisted-ip]]


    The user whose Bug was removed from the website, made a clone bug report. https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/8215

    Comparing the report on the site with the screenshot:

  • troed@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    This bugs me. I selected between pfSense and OpnSense a few years ago and got the impression pfSense’s support and UI was better. I’m not looking forward to having reconfigure everything if switching :/

    • coronach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Been very happy with OPNsense since switching a few years ago.

    • Matty_r@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I made the switch. It was a good excuse to clean up my config though.

      I ended up installing it in a VM initially, just so I could configure it how I needed before going live. Then made a config backup, installed opnsense, then restored the config (after changing the interface names)

      I’ll never go back to pfsense.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Tried OpenSense twice, always fell back to pfSense.

      Plus, work gave me a rackmount Netgate appliance, so I’m on it until that unit dies.

    • Parafaragaramus@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      There are some convertors that can wrangle a pfsense config into opnsense. I had the exact same issue and exact same thought about two years ago. But I do like Opnsense much, much more nowadays.

  • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    Isn’t this why we have OpnSense?

    • somewa@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      3 days ago

      No, OPNsense doesn’t exist because of pfsense false advertising and misleading people to think it’s open source.

      More like it exists because of pfsense not being open source. This has nothing to do with the advertising.

      • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        ✅

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        What’s proprietary about pfSense? Been using it for a decade and this is news to me.

        • coronach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          The article is a good start. For one, you cannot build it. They have some sort of proprietary blob in their toolchain so that only netgate can build it.

          Between that, the massive security fuckups, and the absolutely horrid behavior from the maintainers I dumped that shit and haven’t looked back.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Netgate are shitbags. Fuck pfSense.

  • mcmodknower@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Btw that seems to be a fork/reupload of a DMCA’d repo.

    • artiman@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      i don’t seem to see a dmca notice in the forked from project

      • mcmodknower@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you click links in the readme (i only tried the last two ones) you get a dmca takedown message.

Opensource@programming.dev

opensource@programming.dev

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !opensource@programming.dev

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

Credits

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

⠀


Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 150 users / day
  • 251 users / week
  • 725 users / month
  • 3.16K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 3.91K subscribers
  • 408 Posts
  • 783 Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Pierre-Yves Lapersonne@programming.dev
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org