INSPIRED
bythatsamefrenchexcellence
INSPIRED
bythatsamefrenchexcellence
This one reads like a CSB report and I am here for it.
I don’t disagree, I just also believe that the people who don’t know what the expected answer is are proportionally more likely to be on the spectrum than not.
That one at least has a reasonably understandable medical purpose, all donated blood is tested for the kinds of diseases that these questions are meant to attmpt to screen for, and any amount of testing that can be avoided early saves them more money to spend on other lifesaving pursuits.
My understanding is more that it presents a “logically correct” choice (making money to pay bills and be generally… alive) and a “socially correct” choice (the corporate answer) to filter people out.
I’ve heard these described as a “legally acceptable way of filtering out people with autism” and man I’ve not seen them the same way since.
It’s very distinct. I wouldn’t call it vomit, but it’s a lingering chemical-ey taste.
I think I have a mutation in a taste bud or something, but Sucralose is really a prominent and nasty taste to me in anything it’s in. Really frustrating to taste it in otherwise sugary drinks, like some of the Monster flavors.
For reference, I also think cilantro tastes like soap. No clue if that’s an indicator or not.
I really don’t understand the aggression, I was talking about the old rich dead people propaganda concerning no taxation without representation 200 years ago, I never said anything about the fuckwads we have today.
If you think I’m saying something different, explain what you read and allow me the opportunity to clarify my intent.
Saying I’m full of shit at this point is just asinine.
I don’t know, I don’t see anyone saying that here.
That’s possibly reframing “no taxation without representation” a bit but I don’t entirely disagree with the sentiment.
They’re cops, you’ve put more thought into it than they did.
I don’t enjoy the idea of babies given circumcisions, I can’t abide genetic tailoring by a person internationally decried as an unethical practitioner doing things in secret just to stoke his ego to make him the first, bypassing the incredibly necessary ethical safeguards that the industry enforces against themselves.
I don’t want him to be able to do what he did in the way that he did it because the way that he did what he did allows for monstrosities to be committed in the name of advancing science at any cost with no thought to potential lifelong unknowable direct consequences in the people being treated.
I don’t have an anti-genetic editing slant, I don’t think the goal is bad.
Why is this disgraced and denounced genome-editing ethics-lacking guy being spammed so fucking much
Would you just go up to a stranger on the street and say that nonsense? And if you can, resist the jackass urge to just say “yes” and actually fucking consider the question honestly.
First three times I got the wheel it triggered.
I didn’t understand the memes.
Then it never happened again.
An ordnance technician at a dead run outranks everybody.
OK, what is the better metric? I’m not trying to gotcha really, but I use tap and pay and my banking apps very incredibly often and would not consider a phone where I couldn’t, and suspect that it is a significant driving factor for others as well.
And steamed carrots slap.