U.S. President Donald Trump, in an interview with NBC News on Saturday, said there would be “serious consequences” if billionaire Elon Musk funds Democratic Party candidates to run against Republicans who vote for Trump’s sweeping tax-cut bill.

Trump declined to say what those consequences would be in the phone interview, and went on to add that he had not had discussions about whether to investigate Musk.

Asked if he thought his relationship with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO was over, Trump said, “I would assume so, yeah.”

  • @apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    50
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    The fact that a billionaire bought an election and can easily buy it again is so plain for all to see and it is repugnant. The rich shouldn’t be.

  • @mossberg590@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    35
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Musk is going to fund Republican candidates in the primaries, non-MAGA Republicans. The idea he would fund Dems is laughable. It will be interesting to see which way the Republicans go, money or MAGA.

    • @Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      713 days ago

      Non maga repugs are terrified of Trump and won’t sand up to him though, there’s no reason to fund them either

  • @evenglow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    2813 days ago

    Trump doesn’t want to get blamed when Democrats start winning elections. If it happens Musk will gloat for credit and the finger pointers will say Trump should not have pissed off Musk.

  • Fingolfinz
    link
    fedilink
    2313 days ago

    Reality is fucking stupid as fuck right now. I think I’m going to mentally check out for a bit

  • @mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1613 days ago

    And, since the Supreme Court has ruled money = speech with the Citizens United ruling, Trump has just set Elon up for a First Amendment case if anything happens. One that the taxpayer will likely foot the bill to defend.

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      1013 days ago

      Threatening action as a government official is taking an action. Under the rules of CU, he has standing. Then again, the Roberts court doesn’t care about stare decisis or the letter of the law or the spirit of the law, just what can keep the grift flowing.

  • @TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1513 days ago

    I’m sure billionaires will be funding Democrats hard, which is why we need to treat the party like neo-feudalists from now on. No matter what they say, they cannot be trusted to do anything but further raid the working class. They’re more of a long term enemy than Trump, and we cannot give them an easy time. They will never be saviors, only new masters.

    • @Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      512 days ago

      they actually fund both, but they fund the gop more when they can get tax cuts, or thier investment wont get taxed to hell.

      • @TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        412 days ago

        The game is fundamentally different now in a worse way. We’re looking at a future of neo feudal politicians once this fascist flame burns through the nation. The end of the US as a unified whole is a genuine possibility. Feudalists gaining control and creating a hellish dystopia with the power of the empire is the alternative. Post Trump America will be never be as successful a liberal democracy as 2024 America was, and 2024 America was absolutely bottom of the barrel.

        America needs to burn and probably will, but that will more likely to be awful than not. It will be a monumental lift to bring about a positive future.